I make it obvious that I?m not a Rush Limbaugh fan and don't listen to his talk show. And I do realize that Limbaugh is sometimes brash and announces insulting things. Having mentioned that, is he wrong to speak out on another potential govt giveaway when the govt. is at the edge bankruptcy, and is so extraordinarily in debt that it would take a miracle to solve the national debt problem? I for one don?t think he's wrong basically, and if that is so only in his selection of words.
His worst mistake, reputedly, was calling a young law student co-ed a slut. I am against name calling and do not do it, but is this just another matter of being politically correct when it comes to a conservative talk show host? There was a time in the history of this country when promiscuity was morally wrong and would never be welcomed by the media not to mention the president of the United States.The reports media replied by saying that the only one wrong in this matter is the person behinf the mic. Hence have things changed so much morally in this country till it's currently accepted as proper for a young woman to require $3,000 bucks worth of contraception in a three year course of law school and request tax payers to foot the bill? That is the main point Limbaugh is making from what I understand. And in contrast to the news media and the president, that is a superb point.
I do nott know Sandra Fluke and certainly don't know her character, but to request the law makers to include $3,000 worth of assistance for each university female for contraception for sex outside of wedding on the grounds of stopping unwanted pregnancies seems to me to be making an attempt to right one wrong with another which makes no sense. And since when is it too much to expect young women to take the responsibility for their own health by avoiding sexual activity that put them in harm's way of contacting sexually transmitted disease and unwanted pregnancies
The question was asked. "Is a lady a slut because she takes contraception pills? " Naturally not unless she is planning on having illicit sex outside of wedding and even then under the new morality she wouldn't be regarded as a slut. Nevertheless without reference to the liberal media and liberal politicians, the moral code of ethics has not changed unless you're ready to declare our culture paganistic.
There are still some in our society, who hold to the moral ethics of the Bible, and it doesn't go down well to be compelled to settle up for promiscuity; it is an intrusion on religious freedom. It must be said also it is not a matter of making an attempt to force anybody to accept any moral code but instead refusing to accept the responsibility of financing a moral code that's unsatisfactory according to Christian beliefs. How Miss Fluke decides to live her life is her business, however it becomes my business if I am asked to uphold and sponsor any actions I deem to be unethical.
His worst mistake, reputedly, was calling a young law student co-ed a slut. I am against name calling and do not do it, but is this just another matter of being politically correct when it comes to a conservative talk show host? There was a time in the history of this country when promiscuity was morally wrong and would never be welcomed by the media not to mention the president of the United States.The reports media replied by saying that the only one wrong in this matter is the person behinf the mic. Hence have things changed so much morally in this country till it's currently accepted as proper for a young woman to require $3,000 bucks worth of contraception in a three year course of law school and request tax payers to foot the bill? That is the main point Limbaugh is making from what I understand. And in contrast to the news media and the president, that is a superb point.
I do nott know Sandra Fluke and certainly don't know her character, but to request the law makers to include $3,000 worth of assistance for each university female for contraception for sex outside of wedding on the grounds of stopping unwanted pregnancies seems to me to be making an attempt to right one wrong with another which makes no sense. And since when is it too much to expect young women to take the responsibility for their own health by avoiding sexual activity that put them in harm's way of contacting sexually transmitted disease and unwanted pregnancies
The question was asked. "Is a lady a slut because she takes contraception pills? " Naturally not unless she is planning on having illicit sex outside of wedding and even then under the new morality she wouldn't be regarded as a slut. Nevertheless without reference to the liberal media and liberal politicians, the moral code of ethics has not changed unless you're ready to declare our culture paganistic.
There are still some in our society, who hold to the moral ethics of the Bible, and it doesn't go down well to be compelled to settle up for promiscuity; it is an intrusion on religious freedom. It must be said also it is not a matter of making an attempt to force anybody to accept any moral code but instead refusing to accept the responsibility of financing a moral code that's unsatisfactory according to Christian beliefs. How Miss Fluke decides to live her life is her business, however it becomes my business if I am asked to uphold and sponsor any actions I deem to be unethical.
About the Author:
About the author: Jimmie Burroughs is a motivational speaker and author who has been concerned in teaching Christian Personal Development for over 30 years. There are more than 600 articles to help you on his internet site in your private expansion. Be certain to take vantage of the FREE offer to get the eBook The 4 Pillars for Private Development while available.
No comments:
Post a Comment